Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sadanand Bhalchandra Sule Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sadanand Bhalchandra Sule Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.) (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 43 Quashed – DDIT(Inv.) Lacked Jurisdiction to Levy ₹10 Lakh Penalty Beyond ₹5 Lakh Limit under CBDT Guidelines: Only Regular AO Can Levy Penalty Exceeding ₹5 Lakh under BMA- ITAT Mumbai Assessee filed four appeals challenging the levy of penalty of ₹10,00,000 each u/s 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) & Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (“BMA”) for non-disclosure of shareholdings in two Singapore entities—Manquist Holdings Pte. Ltd. & Aavishkaar Internationa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930