Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Varadappan Natarajan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Varadappan Natarajan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Search Assessments Cannot Be Fishing Expeditions – Only Seized Material Can Trigger Additions- ITAT Chennai Quashes Additions in Search Assessment for Lack of Incriminating Material Chennai ITAT, in the case of V. Natarajan, a Chartered Accountant & Chairman of Pavai Varam Educational Trust, quashed the additions made by AO in assessments framed u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) for A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17, holding that no additions can be made under Section 153A without incriminating material found during search. A search u/s 132 was conducted on 27....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930