Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manjinder Singh Grewal Vs Addl/ CIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manjinder Singh Grewal Vs Addl/ CIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Cash Deposit by Father for Safekeeping Not a Loan or Deposit -ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹20 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D Assessee appealed against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi confirming penalty u/s 271D of ₹20 lakh for violation of section 269SS. AO had observed that Assessee received ₹20 lakh in cash during F.Y. 2008-09 & deposited the same in his Kotak Mahindra Bank account on 10.05.2008. Treating this as acceptance of a cash loan or deposit exceeding ₹20,000, AO levied penalty u/s 271D, which CIT(A) upheld. Assessee explained tha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930