Case Law Details
Case Name : Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Jaipur
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Conclusion: Where income was offered on presumptive basis under section 44AD, there was no need to maintain books of accounts therefore addition made against the vegetable vendor was deleted for failure to substantiate the unexplained cash deposit.
Held: During the course of assessment proceedings, AO found that assessee had made cash sales of Rs.17,76,160/- against cash purchase of Rs. 1,90,500/- only. He submitted that he was not required to maintain any books of accounts as income was declared u/s 44AD for which assessee furnished copies of P&L account...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

