Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pramod Pareek Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Conclusion: Where income was offered on presumptive basis under section 44AD, there was no need to maintain books of accounts therefore addition made against the vegetable vendor was deleted for failure to substantiate the unexplained cash deposit.

Held: During the course of assessment proceedings, AO found that assessee had made cash sales of Rs.17,76,160/- against cash purchase of Rs. 1,90,500/- only. He submitted that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31