Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ratandeep Gold &
Appeal Number : Diamond Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Varanasi)
Date of Judgement/Order : ITA No. 136/VNS/2020
Related Assessment Year : 03/02/2023
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Varansi)

ITAT Varanasi held that principles of natural justice demand that both the parties, i.e. assessee as well as AO, shall be given opportunity of being heard, before being condemned and any prejudice is caused. Impugned order not satisfying the same is liable to be set aside.

Facts- Post conduct of survey, AO issued notice to the assessee asking on the basis of data retrieved from the computer and recorded statements, undisclosed profit should not be treated as unaccounted income under section 69 of the Income Tax Act.

Further, AO also contested that difference of Rs. 43 Lacs figured out under the head furniture and fixture should not be treated as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act.

CIT(A) accepted the appeal filed by the assessee. Accordingly, being aggrieved, revenue has preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031