Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Arvind Ratanchand Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Arvind Ratanchand Jain (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT upheld the restriction of addition to 12.5% of alleged bogus purchases, rejecting the AO’s higher addition of 25%, and reaffirmed the settled principle that only profit element embedded in such purchases can be taxed. The AO had treated purchases of ₹54.27 crore as non-genuine due to: Suppliers having cancelled GST registrations, Circular trading patterns, Lack of proper transport and documentation, Non-commensurate banking transactions. Accordingly, AO made 25% addition (₹13.56 crore). However, the CIT(A): Noted that sales w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930