Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Yogesh Chander & Sons HUF Hero Nagar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Yogesh Chander & Sons HUF Hero Nagar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Beneficial Owner Wins! TDS Cannot Be Denied Due to PAN Mismatch;  TDS Belongs to HUF, Not Karta! ITAT Restores Credit After Rule 37BA Compliance Assessee, a HUF, filed its return declaring income of ₹46,08,750 & claimed TDS credit of ₹4,57,068. CPC while processing u/s 143(1) allowed only ₹1,48,318 & disallowed ₹3,08,750 TDS on dividend income received from Hero MotoCorp Ltd. on the ground that such TDS was reflected in Form 26AS of the Karta (Individual) & not in the PAN of the HUF. CIT(A) upheld the denial...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031