Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sheetal Jewellery House LLP (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sheetal Jewellery House LLP (ITAT Mumbai) Bad Debts Allowed on Write-off 26AS Mismatch Cannot Trigger Addition – ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal Revenue challenged deletion of multiple additions by CIT(A) including bad debts (₹3.61 Cr), 26AS mismatch (₹12.03 lakh) & commission (₹2.98 lakh). On Bad Debts (Sec 36(1)(vii)): Assessee wrote off debt relating to earlier years & had filed NCLT claim ITAT held: post-1989 amendment, mere write-off is sufficient; no need to prove irrecoverability (relying on TRF Ltd) Deduction rightly allowed On 26AS mismatch: Difference due to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930