Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Goldmohur Design And Apparel Park Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Goldmohur Design And Apparel Park Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Form 26AS Mismatch Alone Not Conclusive: Mumbai ITAT Orders Verification to Avoid Double Taxation The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Goldmohur Design and Apparel Park Ltd. (AY 2018-19) for statistical purposes by setting aside additions made solely on the basis of Form 26AS mismatches and restoring the issues to the Assessing Officer for factual verification. The additions related to interest income (₹14.39 lakh) and sale of services (₹23.07 lakh) were confirmed by the CIT(A) primarily due to lack of corroborat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930