Case Law Details
Dinesh Shah (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The Mumbai Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently addressed a crucial issue in the case of Dinesh Shah (HUF) vs. DCIT regarding the initiation of action under section 153C of the Income-tax Act. The crux of the matter revolved around the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 153C of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal examined whether such action could be initiated solely based on material impounded during a survey, rather than material seized during a search.
The tribunal referenced the provisions of section 153C of the Act, which specify that for action to be initiated under this section, the material seized or requisitioned should have a direct bearing on the determination of the total income of the assessee. However, it noted that the material considered in this case was impounded during a survey conducted under section 133A, not seized during a search under section 132.
Analyzing the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer, the tribunal observed discrepancies between the documentation referred to as seized and the actual circumstances of impoundment during the survey. It emphasized that the statutory requirement for invoking section 153C is the seizure of material during a search.
Further, the tribunal cited precedents and legal principles, including the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Sinhagad Technical Education Society, to support its interpretation. It highlighted the mandatory nature of the condition that material must be seized during a search for section 153C proceedings to be valid.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
