Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mulakala Mohan Krishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Mulakala Mohan Krishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) 80IA Deduction Cannot Be Denied for Delay of Few Days in Uploading Audit Report – Procedural Requirement Not Substantive- ITAT Hyderabad Assessee, proprietor of M/s. Sarvotham Care, had two units – a solar power generation unit eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA(4)(iv) & a manufacturing unit. For A.Y. 2021-22, he claimed deduction of ₹49.28 lakh u/s 80-IA on profits from the solar unit. Return of income filed within the extended due date (15 March 2022). Form 10CCB audit report was signed before 15 Feb 2022 but uploaded on 23 Feb...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031