Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mulakala Mohan Krishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mulakala Mohan Krishna Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) 80IA Deduction Cannot Be Denied for Delay of Few Days in Uploading Audit Report – Procedural Requirement Not Substantive- ITAT Hyderabad Assessee, proprietor of M/s. Sarvotham Care, had two units – a solar power generation unit eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA(4)(iv) & a manufacturing unit. For A.Y. 2021-22, he claimed deduction of ₹49.28 lakh u/s 80-IA on profits from the solar unit. Return of income filed within the extended due date (15 March 2022). Form 10CCB audit report was signed before 15 Feb 2022 but uploaded on 23 Feb...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930