Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 1918-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted for Inadvertent Excess under section 54F/54B Claim Pune ITAT “B” Bench condoned an extraordinary delay of 1918 days and deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) holding that mere excess claim of deduction due to inadvertent mistake does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The assessees, co-owners of land under a development agreement, had offered LTCG spread over multiple years and claimed deductions u/s 54F & 54B. For AY 2015-16, while only ₹27.14 lakh of LTCG remained taxable, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031