Case Law Details
Case Name : Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
1918-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted for Inadvertent Excess under section 54F/54B Claim
Pune ITAT “B” Bench condoned an extraordinary delay of 1918 days and deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) holding that mere excess claim of deduction due to inadvertent mistake does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars.
The assessees, co-owners of land under a development agreement, had offered LTCG spread over multiple years and claimed deductions u/s 54F & 54B. For AY 2015-16, while only ₹27.14 lakh of LTCG remained taxable, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


