Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

1918-Day Delay Condoned; No Penalty on Excess Section 54F/54B Claim

Case Law Details

Case Name
Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-2016
Advertisement
Amol Vasant Deshmukh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 1918-Day Delay Condoned; Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted for Inadvertent Excess under section 54F/54B Claim Pune ITAT “B” Bench condoned an extraordinary delay of 1918 days and deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) holding that mere excess claim of deduction due to inadvertent mistake does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The assessees, co-owners of land under a development agreement, had offered LTCG spread over multiple years and claimed deductions u/s 54F & 54B. For AY 2015-16, while only ₹27.14 lakh of LTCG remained taxable, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,641

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *