Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashokbhai Anbabhai Kachadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashokbhai Anbabhai Kachadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reopening Beyond 3 Years Fails ₹50-Lakh Test: 8% Estimation on Cash Deposits Can’t Save Time-Barred 148 Ahmedabad ITAT held that reassessment initiated beyond three years was without jurisdiction, as the escaped income did not meet the ₹50-lakh threshold prescribed u/s 149(1)(b). The Assessee, a commission agent in fruits & vegetables, had not filed return for AY 2013-14, claiming income below basic exemption. Based on information of cash deposits, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 30-07-2022 (beyond 3 years). During reassessment, AO tre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031