Case Law Details
Dhan Prakash Gupta Vs CGST Department (Supreme Court of India)
Introduction: In a recent judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, a matter involving Dhan Prakash Gupta vs. the CGST Department was brought to light. The focus of the case revolved around the availability of an alternative legal remedy under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act.
Detailed Analysis: The petitioner, represented by Shri Chandrakant Tyagi, had sought relief in this matter. The High Court initially stated that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy at their disposal. However, it made certain observations regarding the merits of the case, ultimately allowing the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies.
The Supreme Court’s decision primarily centers on the issue of whether the High Court was right in making observations on the case’s merits, even though it acknowledged the existence of an alternative statutory remedy. The Court emphasized that once the High Court recognized the availability of an alternative remedy, it should not have proceeded to comment on the case’s merits or stated that the petitioner could explore alternative remedies.
In light of these considerations, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition while preserving the petitioner’s right to avail themselves of the alternative remedy if they so choose. The Court also clarified that any observations made on the merits of the case in the impugned order should not hinder the appellate authority from considering the petitioner’s case on its merits.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
