Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Penalty on Disclosure of undisclosed income in revised return to buy peace

Case Name : Senthamarai Constructions Vs CIT (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 178 to 180 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/06/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee liable to deduct TDS under s 194C at 2 per cent on payment made for hiring the studio and utilising the dubbing facilities, which included service through the studio staff

Case Name : ACIT Vs Mansih Dutt (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 4017 (Mum.) of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation as per section 32(2) is automatic

Case Name : ACIT Vs Mehsana District Co-op Milk Producers Union Ltd (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 825/Ahd/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 1999- 2000
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Amount of brought business loss and unabsorbed depreciation is not required to be first set-off before computing the deduction allowable under s 80HHC for the purpose of computing book profits, matter remitted to make calculation under s 80HHC

Case Name : Bisazza India (P) Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1381/Ahd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2000- 2001
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Provisions of section 79 not applicable to deemed public company

Case Name : Meredith Traders (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal Nos. 3435 and 3436 (Mum.) of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2004- 05 and 2005- 06
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

If the prosecution proves its case on basis of evidence and the same is also supported by the implied admission of the accused, the conviction of the accused under s 276C(1), 277 and 278 is not liable to be interfered with on the ground that the return did not bear his signature and was not filed by him

Case Name : ITO Vs Mangat Ram Norata Ram Narwana and Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal No(s). 8 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/05/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Depreciation to be allowed on assets even if cost fully allowed as application of income under section 11

Case Name : CIT Vs Market Committee, Tohona (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 186 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Punjab and Haryana HC (457)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the unexplained investment on the fact that there was no difference in the cost of construction declared by the Assessee and that worked out by the DVO

Case Name : CIT and Anr Vs R Hanumaiah Associates (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 3225, 3224 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Karnataka High Court (635)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 80G registration can be rejected for conducting Bhagwat Katha

Case Name : M/s. Shiv Ratan Rathi Foundation Vs. The CIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1242/ JP/2010 Section 80G
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Jaipur (448)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

ERP Software expenditure allowable as revenue expenditure – Bombay HC

Case Name : CIT Vs. Raychem RPG Ltd (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 4176 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031