CIT and Anr Vs R Hanumaiah Associates (Karnataka High Court) – No addition can be made on account of the unexplained investment on the basis of the DVO findings when the assessee satisfactorily explains that the difference was on account of the construction expenditure incurred, which was not considered by the DVO.
CIT and Anr v R Hanumaiah Associates
Decided By- Karnatka High Court
ITA Nos. 3225, 3224 of 2005
Decided on: 12 July 2011
This ITA.No. 3225 OF 2005 is filed under section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961, arising out of order dated 30.06.2005 passed in ITA No. 1294/Bang/2003 for the Assessment year 1996-1997, praying to formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein and allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA. No. 1294/Bang/2003 dated 30.06.2005 and confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Circle-6(3), Bangalore.
This ITA.No. 3224 OF 2005 is filed under section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961,. arising out of order dated 30.06.2005 passed in ITA No. 1293/Bang/2003 for the Assessment year 1995-1996, praying to formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein and allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA,No.1293/Bang/2003 dated 30.06.2005 and confirm the order-. of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Circle-6(3), Bangalore.





