If the prosecution proves its case on basis of evidence and the same is also supported by the implied admission of the accused, the conviction of the accused under s 276C(1), 277 and 278 is not liable to be interfered with on the ground that the return did not bear his signature and was not filed by him

ITO Vs Mangat Ram Norata Ram Narwana and Anr.

Supreme Court of India

Criminal Appeal No(s). 8 of 2005

 Decided on: 5 May 2011

Order

1. The Income Tax Officer, aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondents has preferred this appeal with leave of the Court. According to the prosecution, respondent no

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.