Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Receipts from activities not having direct nexus with shipping/dredging activities not exempt under tonnage tax scheme

Case Name : Dredging Corporation Of India Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 6 to 8/Vizag/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Visakhapatnam (139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Transfer Pricing – Pygmies Not Comparable With Giants

Case Name : DCIT Vs Deloitte Consulting India Pvt. Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1082/Hyd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Hyderabad (630)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Income arising from activities which are only incidental to the business of developing, operating and maintaining infrastructure facility will not qualify for deduction under s. 80IA

Case Name : L&T Transportation Infrastructure Limited Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 1680/Mds./10
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/07/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Jurisdictional CIT should not be part of DRP to avoid Bias- Uttarakhand High Court

Case Name : Hyundai Heavy Industries Ltd VS The Union of India and others (Uttarakhand High Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Writ Petition No. 1778 of 2010 (M/S)
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Uttarakhand High Court (67)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Maintenance of separate books of account for STP units is not a prerequisite to avail deduction under section 10A

Case Name : IBM India P. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 1151Bang/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CUP method not suitable to benchmark royalty payment in the absence of comparable uncontrolled transactions

Case Name : M/s Cabot India Ltd. Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 6622/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

An assessee cannot be said to be a defaulter in payment of advance tax if he had no liability to pay any advance tax under s 208 on any of the due dates for payment of the advance tax

Case Name : Emami Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 199 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

ITAT Pune -Domestic segment cannot be regarded as a comparable for the export segment

Case Name : Brintons Carpets Asia P Ltd. Vs Dy. CIT Circle 1(1) Pune (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1296/PN/10
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Where assessee paid tax by way of TDS in respect of interest paid to a bank which never accrued to said bank, such tax paid was to be refunded to assessee

Case Name : Pasupati Acrylon Ltd. Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (C) No. 5293 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/12/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Loss making companies cannot be rejected as comparables simplicitor on ground of losses but can be excluded on other comparability aspects

Case Name : M/s. Yum Restaurants (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Additional CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3796/Del/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031