Cost of fuel borne by service recipient and this cost of this fuel could not be subjected to charge of GST by adding the value of free diesel in the transaction value of GTA service done by assessee.
Explore Uttarakhand High Court’s judgment on whether Joint Commissioner can act as GST Appellate Authority. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Uttarakhand HC permits petitioner to file GST registration cancellation revocation application due to miscommunication with tax consultant.
Uttarakhand High Court ruling clarifies that under GST Act Section 74, purchasers aren’t liable if suppliers fail to deposit taxes. Full analysis provided.
Explore the interpretation of Sections 44 BB(1) and 44 BB(2) of the Income Tax Act in the case of CIT Vs B.J. Services Co. Me Ltd. as per the judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court.
Uttarakhand High Court held that invocation of proceedings u/s. 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for minor infraction i.e. for not carrying any delivery challan unjustified as there is no intention to evade tax.
Uttarakhand High Court held that issuance of notice to the Transferor Company (i.e. non-existent entity) and order passed u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act against the non-existent entity is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
Uttarakhand High Court held that saving clause under section 174(2)(e) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act permits the initiation of proceedings under service tax post 01.07.2017 i.e. post repeal of the Service Tax regime
Uttarakhand High Court held that as per notification dated 02.08.2019, Tax Audit Reports are mandatorily required to have Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN). In absence, of the same, rejection of petitioner’s technical bids completely justified.
Uttarakhand High Court held that issuance of notice by Commissioner (Appeals) mandatory in terms of section 251(2) of the Income Tax Act before enhancing the assessment.
