Follow Us :

Filter Judiciary

Found 1680 Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Afcons Pauling Joint Venture (Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Jalandhar Vs M/s Afcons Pauling Joint Venture (Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : C.E.A. No. 23 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13658) Punjab and Haryana HC (454)

Rule-2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules does not require that service has to be rendered at the factory of the manufacturer for the purpose of eligibility for service tax credit

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Alidhara Textool Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. A/216-222/2009-WZB/AHD
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/1/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3866) CESTAT Ahmedabad (813)

Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Versus Hongo India(P) Ltd. & Anr. (Supreme Court)

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Vs M/S Hongo India(P) Ltd.& Anr (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Appeal (Civil) No(s). 14467/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/12/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2361)

If Assessee has merely taken cenvat credit and not utilized or taken any advantage of such credit, payment of interest is not sustainable

Case Name : Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 3873 of 2005 SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/01/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3866) CESTAT Delhi (902)

NICHOLAS PIRAMEL (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (CESTAT MUMBAI)

Case Name : Nicholas Piramel (I) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/823/2008-WZB/(LB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/10/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3866) CESTAT Mumbai (500)

VMT Spinning Company Limited (Advance Ruling)

Case Name : M/s VMT Spinning Company Limited (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : Ruling No. AAR/05/ST/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3689)

Whether the goods manufactured by hundred percent EOU when sold in India can be subjected to levy of Education Cess under the Central Excise Act?

Case Name : Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal No. 96 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/08/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13658) Bombay High Court (1862)

Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. vs. C.C.E.- Cestat Delhi

Case Name : M/s Bosch Chasssis Systems India Ltd Vs. C.C.E., Delhi III (CESTAT New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal No.855 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/09/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3866) CESTAT Delhi (902)

Levy of penalty U/s. 11AC is a mandatory penalty & there is no scope for any discretion: SC

Case Name : Union of India Vs Dharamendra Textile Processors (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 10289-10303 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/09/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2361)

Penalty u/s. 11AC r.w. Rule 25 cannot be imposed for suppression or contravention of facts unless it was made intentionally

Case Name : CC&CE, Kanpur Vs. M/s Beekay Enterprises (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 73 of 2007-SM
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/10/2006
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3866) CESTAT Delhi (902)
Search Post by Date
June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930