Follow Us :
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1684 Results

Assessee entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs utilized in the generation of electricity to the extent to which they are using the produced electricity within their factory

Case Name : Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs CCE (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 5554 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/08/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2362)
Download Judgment/Order

Credit cannot be denied on ground that, documents were not in the name of assessee’s factory

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs & C. Ex., Vapi Vs DNH Spinners (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/1476/2009-WZB/AHD10-7-2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)

If ST 3 returns and CENVAT credit returns are filed, then department cannot ask for tax beyond 1 year

Case Name : Chandra Shipping & Trading Services Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Visakhapatnam-II (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : [2009] 21 STT 266 (BANG. - CESTAT)
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Bangalore (302)

CESTAT is correct in allowing benefit of penalty upto 25% of duty amount

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Rohtak Vs M/s J.R. Fabrics (P) Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : CEA No. 5 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/04/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13780) Punjab and Haryana HC (455)
Download Judgment/Order

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Afcons Pauling Joint Venture (Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Jalandhar Vs M/s Afcons Pauling Joint Venture (Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : C.E.A. No. 23 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13780) Punjab and Haryana HC (455)
Download Judgment/Order

Rule-2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules does not require that service has to be rendered at the factory of the manufacturer for the purpose of eligibility for service tax credit

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Alidhara Textool Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. A/216-222/2009-WZB/AHD
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/1/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)

Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Versus Hongo India(P) Ltd. & Anr. (Supreme Court)

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Vs M/S Hongo India(P) Ltd.& Anr (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Appeal (Civil) No(s). 14467/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/12/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2362)

If Assessee has merely taken cenvat credit and not utilized or taken any advantage of such credit, payment of interest is not sustainable

Case Name : Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 3873 of 2005 SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/01/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Delhi (902)

NICHOLAS PIRAMEL (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (CESTAT MUMBAI)

Case Name : Nicholas Piramel (I) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/823/2008-WZB/(LB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/10/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Mumbai (500)
Download Judgment/Order

VMT Spinning Company Limited (Advance Ruling)

Case Name : M/s VMT Spinning Company Limited (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : Ruling No. AAR/05/ST/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/09/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3695)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Search Post by Date
June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930