Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nicholas Piramel (I) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 The provisions of Rules 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 are not applicable when the amount equivalent of the Cenvat Credit attributable to the common inputs used in, or in relation to, the manufacture of exempted final products has been paid prior to the removal of exempted final products from the factory. IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI [LARGER BENCH] NICHOLAS PIRAMEL (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-I Final Order No. A/823/2008-WZB/(LB), dated 12-8-2008 in Appeal No. E/1405/2005 O   R   D   E   R M.V. Ravindran, Member (J) (For...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930