Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Rohtak Vs M/s J.R. Fabrics (P) Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Punjab and Haryana HC
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
The argument of the Revenue that the judgement in Dharmendra Textile Processor’s case (supra) would apply and penalty equal to the amount of duty of excise assessed by the Assessing Authority is to be paid. We are afraid that such an argument would not be available because judgement in Dharmendra Textile Processor’s case (supra) dealt with Section 11 AC of the Act and has concluded the mandatory nature of the penalty contemplated by the proviso . In para 26, reference has been made to the Union Budget of 1996-97, when Section 11 AC of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.