Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22716 Results

Sec. 271B No penalty on club having bonafide belief of mutuality

Case Name : M/s Koramangala Club Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 279 & 280/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14242) Karnataka High Court (656)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TP: Turnover criteria cannot be ignored while selecting comparables

Case Name : CIT Vs M/s. Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 18 OF 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/09/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All High Courts (14242) Bombay High Court (1917)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 12AA Deemed registration effective after 6 month from application

Case Name : CIT Vs Society For The Promn. Of Edn (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 1478 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/02/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2394)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Mere change in head of income not attracts concealment penalty

Case Name : CIT Vs Shri. Hiralal Doshi (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 2331 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/02/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All High Courts (14242) Bombay High Court (1917)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TP: Turnover is a relevant factor to consider comparability

Case Name : CIT Vs Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 18 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/9/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All High Courts (14242) Bombay High Court (1917)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Shares Buyback cannot be equated with capital reduction

Case Name : Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3726/Mum/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts : All ITAT (15079) ITAT Mumbai (3603)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TP: Software developer cannot be compared with service provider

Case Name : GXS India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : IT(TP)A No. 1444(Bang) 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/07/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (15079) ITAT Bangalore (1096)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Green signal to – Female member can be Karta of HUF – Delhi HC

Case Name : Mrs. Sujata Sharma Vs Shri Manu Gupta (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : CS(OS) 2011/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14242) Delhi High Court (3429)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TP: No deduction u/s 10A on enhanced value after ALP adjustment

Case Name : Headstrong Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6200/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/02/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (15079) ITAT Delhi (3728)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Demand Stay extension valid, if no change in facts from last stay

Case Name : Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Stay Application No. 39/Mum/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (15079) ITAT Mumbai (3603)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031