Follow Us :

Filter Judiciary

Found 1721 Results

Brush cutter classifiable under CTH 84672900: CESTAT Chennai

Case Name : Kisankraft Machine Tools Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 41118 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Chennai (644)

CESTAT Delhi: CBIC Instruction Challenged, Appeals Below Threshold Limit

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs Vs Century Metal Recycling Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 51976 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Delhi (902)

Bharti Airtel Loses Customs Duty Exemption Case for Battery Fuse Units

Case Name : Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 2581 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Bangalore (302)

Delhi HC Upholds Penalties under Customs Act for Gold Smuggled with mens-rea

Case Name : Rameshwar Tiwari Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 9273/2021 & CM Appl. 28834/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13780) Delhi High Court (3357)

CAAR Ruling on Customs Duty Exemption for Aircraft Engine Parts

Case Name : In re Shriprop Aerospace Private Limited (CAAR New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Ruling No. CAAR/De1/Shriprop Aerospace/07/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3695) CAAR (238)

Importer cannot be penalized for Incorrect mention of country of origin

Case Name : Aspam Petronergy Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.-Kandla (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Custom Appeal No. 10967 of 2018 -DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)

CHA was not required to advise on Assessment aspect to Clients unless Solicited

Case Name : Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs-Kandla Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Custom Appeal No. 10625 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)

Body Massager cannot be Classified as Adult Sex Toy: Bombay HC

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs NS-V Vs DOC Brown Industries LLP (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal (L) No. 582 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13780) Bombay High Court (1874)

Enhancement of import value based on consent letter without following due process is unsustainable: CESTAT Ahmedabad

Case Name : Rajkamal Industrial Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.-Kandla (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 10368 of 2015- DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)

Minor Discrepancies No Basis for Customs Refund Recovery if CA Certified submitted

Case Name : Santosh Timber Trading Co Ltd Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 11344 of 2014-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/02/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3874) CESTAT Ahmedabad (814)
Search Post by Date
June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930