Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Fujikawa Power Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : Appeal No.E/60966/2019-Ex (SM)
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/11/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Fujikawa Power Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh)

In a landmark decision, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Chandigarh has ruled in favor of Fujikawa Power against the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CCE & ST), granting an annual interest rate of 12% on excise duty refunds. This case, which revolves around the delayed refund of excise duty payments, underscores the rights of appellants to receive timely financial compensation.

Detailed Analysis: The appeals, stemming from two separate but related cases, challenge the rejection of interest on delayed refunds by the authorities below. The core issue is the entitlement to interest from the date of duty deposit until the refund payment. The tribunal, referencing the Central Excise Act of 1944 and drawing parallels with the Income Tax Act, emphasized the uniformity in the provisions regarding interest on delayed refunds across different statutes.

Fujikawa Power, in its appeal, argued that the retention and utilization of their funds by the Revenue, without timely reimbursement, warranted compensation by way of interest. The tribunal, persuaded by precedents set by the Supreme Court and various High Courts, upheld this view. Notably, the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sandvik Asia Limited was highlighted, establishing the principle that appellants are due compensation for the financial losses incurred due to the delayed refund of excise duty payments.

Conclusion: The CESTAT’s decision to award a 12% annual interest on excise duty refunds from the date of initial payment until the refund underscores the judiciary’s stance on ensuring fairness and financial justice for appellants. This ruling not only sets a significant precedent for similar cases but also reinforces the legal framework ensuring timely compensations. It marks a critical point in the ongoing efforts to streamline the refund process and uphold the financial rights of taxpayers within the ambit of excise duty regulations.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031