Supreme Court held that as there is no final assessment in fake invoice case made under GST Act, the appellant cannot be said to be under a legal liability. Accordingly, condition of pre-deposit for grant of anticipatory bail not imposable.
Basic premise of Section 105 & search proceedings is reasonable belief that some objective material exists on record to trigger searches
Supreme Court of India held that in money laundering case the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence.
Supreme Court of India held that conditions under Section 45 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is applicable to Anticipatory Bail application under section 438 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Supreme Court held that Article 3 of the Constitution of India provides that Parliament may by law form new States and alter the areas, boundaries or names of the existing States (which includes Union Territory).
Supreme Court held that employees who secured VRS benefits and left the service of MSFC voluntarily during this period, stand on a different footing. They cannot claim parity with those who worked continuously, discharged their functions, and thereafter superannuated.
Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration in respect of exemption u/s 2(15) or section 11 in respect of publication of advertisement for consideration in light of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority.
CBDT informed that field formations have been filing appeals/petitions in physical as well as in e-filing mode. In compliance of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, field formations have been directed to ensure that filings of appeals/petitions before the High Court’s should take place in the e-filing mode only.
Pass an order to respondents to ensure effective income tax regulation on sale of personal cars in order to prevent misuse of tax regulations like: (a) In addition to PAN card, a copy of last return filed should be made mandatory for purchasing a personal car. [b] Withdraw tax benefit for second car to companies or professionals.
SC held that order directing special audit under Section 142(2A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is required to be communicated to appellant-assessee, so as to know the reasons, and, if required, the assessee can choose to exercise the option to challenge the order.
