Denial of pension is a continuing wrong. This Court cannot also be oblivious to the difficulties of a retired employee in approaching the Court, which could include financial constraints.
Supreme Court held that mere possession of price-sensitive information doesnt prove that the person was indulged in insider trading. There must be an attempt to take advantage of or encash the benefit of the information so possessed.
Goa State Co op Milk Producers Union Ltd. Vs State of Goa (Supreme Court of India) Being a dispute with respect to the constitutional validity of the relevant provisions of the Goa Cess on Fluid Milk (Control) Act, 2000, only on that ground alone and the issue is with respect to legislative competence, issue notice […]
K. Paramasivam Vs Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) The question raised in the said appeal is whether CIRP can be initiated against the Corporate Guarantor without proceeding against the principal borrower. The issues raised in this appeal are settled by this Court in Laxmi Pat Surana v. Union Bank of […]
SC held that Non delivery of a new car can be said to be an unfair trade practice and even it can be said to be dishonesty on the part of the dealer and against the morality and ethics
CIT Vs UTI Bank Ltd (Supreme Court of India) SC upheld its judgment in ‘South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax’ and held that the proportionate disallowance of interest is not warranted, under Section 14A of Income Tax Act for investments made in tax free bonds/ securities which yield tax free dividend and […]
SC will hear issue of constitutional validity of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, which does not allow input tax credit on immovable property
For considering value for refund under Section 173L of Central Excise Act, what is required to be considered is value of returned goods
Arbitrator has discretion to grant post-award interest. Section 37(1)(b) does not fetter discretion of arbitrator to grant post-award interest
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India invoked Article 142 of the Constitution of India and have directed to form new arbitral Tribunal due to disputes in the fee structure provided in IV Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
