Hon’ble Supreme Court dismisses a departmental appeal in CIT v. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd and held that the interest income earned by Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) on non-performing assets (NPAs) should not be taxed on the accrual basis.
CIT Vs Rajasthan and Gujarati Charitable Foundation (Supreme Court of India) Depreciation allowable in assets cost of which has already been allowed as application of income. Amendment in section 11(6) restricting depreciation in such came is prospective in nature. These are the petitions and appeals filed by the Income Tax Department against the orders passed […]
Whether the Multi-National Accounting Firms (MAFs) are operating in India in violation of law in force in a clandestine manner, and no effective steps are being taken to enforce the said law. If so, what orders are required to be passed to enforce the said law.
Whether, the value of goods/material supplied or provided free of cost by a service recipient and used for providing the taxable service of construction or industrial complex, is to be included in computation of gross amount (charged by the service provider), for valuation of the taxable service
National Travel Service Vs. CIT (Supreme Court of India) The question that arises in these appeals is as to whether Section 2(22)(e) of the Act gets attracted inasmuch as a loan has been made to a shareholder, who after the amendment, is a person who is the beneficial owner of shares holding not less than […]
Whether Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services availed for transportation of goods from place of removal to buyer’s premises will be considered as input service within ambit of Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004?
Capital gain arising under a Joint Development Agreement which never materialized for want of necessary permissions was nothing but a hypothetical income and the same could not, therefore, be taxed under section 45 read with section 48.
Sec. 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), is one such deeming provision that has remain point of litigation over various issues since its inception. One such issue is applicability of provisions of section 2(22)(e) when a shareholder is beneficial shareholder or registered shareholder.
We direct that in computing the taxable turnover for the relevant years, the appellant would be entitled to a deduction of the trade discount, following the parameters laid down in paragraph 40 of the judgment in Southern Motors (supra) and as explained above.
These petitions and appeals filed by the department arises due to the order of various High Courts, granting benefit of depreciation on the assets acquired by the assessee registered as charitable institutions under section 12A of the Income Tax Act (Act).
