G Ramesh Vs Kanike Harish Kumar Ujwal & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) In terms of the explanation to Section 141, the expression ‘company’ has been defined to mean any body corporate and to include a firm or other association of Sub-section (1) of Section 141 postulates that where an offence is committed under Section […]
Presumption that investment is made out of interest free funds is possible when Interest free funds is available with the assessee.
C.I.T. Bombay Vs Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K.Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Conclusion: AO was directed while determining sugarcane purchase price paid to the cane growers by the assessee-society to take into account the manner in which the business works, the modalities and manner in which SAP/additional purchase price/final price were decided and to determine what amount […]
SFIO Vs Rahul Modi (Supreme Court of India) 1. Leave granted. 2. These Appeals challenge the correctness of the common interim order dated 20.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Crl.) Nos.3842 and 3843 of 2018. 3. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies […]
Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd Vs Devasis Rudra (Supreme Court of India) In terms of the agreement, the date for handing over possession was 31 December 2008, with a grace period of six months. Even in 2011, when the buyer filed a consumer complaint, he was ready and willing to accept possession. It would […]
CIT Vs Ms Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court) The short question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department on the ground that it has rendered infructuous. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant (Income Tax […]
Supreme Court allows appeal, criticizes High Court’s technical view on delay. Directs consideration on merits due to pending similar issue in the High Court.
Reading of Section 80HH along with Section 80A would clearly signify that such a deduction has to be of gross profits and gains, i.e., before computing the income as specified in Sections 30 to 43D of the Act.
Deduction under section 80-IC was allowable to assessee @ 100% for a period of 5 years and for remaining 5 Assessment Years @ 25% (or 30% where the assessee is a company) as once assessee had started claiming deduction under Section 80-IC and the initial Assessment Year had commenced within the aforesaid period of 10 years, there could not be another initial Assessment Year thereby allowing 100% deduction for the next 5 years also.
SC held that once the court has drawn presumption of existence of legally enforceable debt as per Section 139 of the NI Act, factors like source of funds are not relevant if the accused has not been able to rebut the presumption.
