Held that Complainant duly paid the amount, however, the developer failed in providing timely construction service. It is directed to refund the amount already paid by Complainant, along with interest @6% p.a.
Dr. R. Singh vs Smt. Shabana (Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) Only the failure of the treatment is not prima facie a ground for Medical Negligence and in order to attract the principle of res ipsa loquitur, Negligence i.e. the breach of a duty exercised by omission to do something which a reasonable man, […]
PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Adithya Banavar (Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) The Brief facts are: Complainants went to Mantri Mall and purchased one litre water bottle of Aquafina, a 330 ml Pepsi Tin and 350 ml bottle of Nimbooz, which costs them at the rate of Rs.20, Rs.50/- and Rs.50/-, respectively in […]
As you know that warranties in an insurance policy is some terms and conditions , the fulfilment of those are necessary to bind both parties on contract of insurance. It is utmost important to follow and fulfil warranty and any breach of warranty may lead to termination or avoidance of contract by he insurance company.
HDFC Bank Limited Vs Jesna Jose (NCDRC) In the present case, the Complainant stated that the credit card was in her possession when the disputed transactions had taken place. She has further stated that the transactions had taken place remotely, several miles away from her actual location and therefore, the reason for the fraudulent transactions […]
Pyaridevi Chabiraj Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. (NCDRC) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) vide its Order dated 28th August, 2020 in ‘M/s Pyaridevi Chabiraj Steels Pvt. Ltd v/s National Insurance Company Ltd. & 3 Ors.’ (Consumer Case No. 833 of 2020) clearly differentiated in the pecuniary jurisdiction of Consumer Disputes […]
Passport is not a commodity: No complaint under consumer Act for Delay in Issuance of Passport.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission orders M/s. Golden Peacock to refund 4,12,98,926/- with 12% interest for delayed possession. Case details.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in the case of Amal Ganguli & Anr. v. M/S. Unitech Limited ordered refund to the Home buyers.
It appears that the Ld. Advocate appearing for the Appellant has mainly contested the appeal on the ground that under such circumstances Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 are not required to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the complainant. However, we are of the opinion that contention of the Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 in this respect cannot be accepted.
