The Tribunal held that income earned by the taxpayer on sale of factory building, plant and machinery although not taxable as “Profit and gains of business or profession” was in the nature of income of business though assessed as capital gains and he
The CIT contended that there was no specification of assets, such as know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature, which was represented by the said goodwill. Further, th
In the case of DHL Express (India) P Ltd. v. ACIT [SA No. 119/Mum/2010], dated 19 November, 2010, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (
Premium paid in excess of the face value of the security held under ‘Held to Maturity’ (‘HTM’) category which has been amortised over the period remaining till maturity is allowable – rules Mumbai Tax Tribunal
Whether in computing the deduction under section 80-IA(8), for the purpose of determining the inter divisional notional transfer price, the market price of the power generated should be taken as the price of power purchased from independent power sup
The Tribunal observed that a contribution to approved superannuation fund is deductible in principle as long as the quantum of the said contribution does not exceed the prescribed limits specified in Rule 87 and 88 of the Income-tax Rules. The limi
It is pertinent to note that the Central Board of Direct Taxes had issued Circular No. 7/2007 dated 23 July 2007 which provides the procedure and circumstances for refund of tax deducted at source under section 195 of the Act to the tax deductor. How
The Tribunal has once again reiterated the principle that interest on fixed deposits kept as margin with banks is effectively connected with the business and would be taxable as business income. Furthermore, the Tribunal held that the direct expenses
Delhi bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of Adobe Systems India Private Limited v. ACIT [201 1-TII-13-ITAT-DEL-TP] (Date of Judgement: 21 January 2011; Assessment Year: 2006-07)held that supernormal profit making co
The decision is relevant to authorised dealers making remittance to non-residents. Though the decision is rendered in the context of remittance to individual’s resident in the UAE, all non-resident Indians can benefit from the principle laid down in
