The Meghalaya High Court directs an assessee to file a revised income tax return to finalize the closure of her Capital Gain Deposit Scheme (CGDS) account.
Meghalaya High Court directs tax authorities to accept a manually filed revised IT return from Shyam Century Ferrous Ltd. for a mistake, citing a Delhi HC precedent.
Meghalaya High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable due to availability of alternate efficacious remedy under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Also held that writ is not maintainable as there is no breach of principles of natural justice.
Meghalaya High Court didn’t entertained petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for demand raised by EPF authorities for payment of damages and dues, due to availability of alternative statutory remedy.
Read the detailed judgment of Meghalaya High Court in PCIT vs North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited. Analysis of income tax appeal and its implications.
Meghalaya High Court directs Customs to refund Rs. 60 lakhs for destroying seized betel nuts. Learn about the court’s decision and the legal proceedings involved.
Meghalaya High Court ruling states pre-takeover electricity dues cannot be recovered from present owner under IBC. Detailed analysis of the judgment provided.
Meghalaya High Court dismissed appeal, ruling that issues concerning service value must be appealed to Supreme Court under section 35L of Central Excise Act.
The Meghalaya High Court upholds the right of the assessee to claim interest on the refund of a deposit made ‘under protest’ during an investigation, despite the absence of a specific provision in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Meghalaya High Court held that extended period of limitation as per proviso to section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 not invocable as there was no element of deceit or intention on the part of the assessee to evade duty.
