Follow Us:

Karnataka High Court

No Suppression if SCN was issued based on disclosure in Balance Sheet

July 3, 2022 3153 Views 0 comment Print

Respondent submitted that the show cause notice issued was on the basis of the balance sheet wherein all activities of the assessee were truly declared. Therefore, there was no suppression of material facts.

Courts bound to Consider all Contentions while deciding Bail Applications

July 2, 2022 759 Views 0 comment Print

When a bail petition is filed, the Court is bound to take into consideration all the contentions raised and pass an appropriate order. It is necessary to look into the material on record which prima facie connects the accused with the crime and adverting to those materials

Request by Bank for issuance of ‘Look Out Circular’ for recovery of dues was unjustified unless it affects economic interest of country

July 1, 2022 1950 Views 0 comment Print

Request by Bank for issuance of Look Out Circular for recovery of dues was unjustified as the  action of Bank was arbitrary, unreasonable and unfair because the Bank was holding security of value of which was more than the amount due from assessee. Any action of the State if it was arbitrary and unreasonable was liable to be interfered.

‘Conduct of Accused’ is Relevant to decide Application for Interim Compensation

July 1, 2022 2598 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the legal intricacies of V. Krishnamurthy vs. Diary Classic Ice Creams in Karnataka High Court. Analysis of interim compensation order under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

TDS u/s 195 not deductible on mere reimbursement

June 29, 2022 1878 Views 0 comment Print

TDS not deductible u/s 195 as the petitioner only seeks to make payment to Walmart Inc. of its payment to the seconded employee which is stated to be by way of reimbursement

Every offence under section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act was compoundable

June 29, 2022 9843 Views 0 comment Print

Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes every offence punishable under the Act as compoundable and there is no bar on parties to compound the offence. However, at the same time, the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu’s Case regarding imposing graded cost on litigant that the accused should pay 15% of the cheque amount by way of cost also was to be borne in mind.

RCM would not lead to double taxation for non-strict adherence to ratio

June 22, 2022 1488 Views 0 comment Print

Vice Chairman Settlement Commission Vs Zyeta Interiors Pvt. Ltd (Karnataka High Court) Whatever the ratio, the tax in its entirety has reached the hands of the ex-chequer. Merely for the reason that there was no strict adherence to the ratio as envisaged during the relevant point of time for payment of tax insofar as the assessee and […]

Bail cannot be denied merely because petitioner alleged to be habitual offenders or have criminal antecedents

June 18, 2022 26868 Views 0 comment Print

Injamam Shariff Vs State By Kengeri Police (Karnataka High Court) It is not in dispute that on theft of phone, a complaint is registered against unknown persons with an allegation that a mobile phone was snatched from the hands of the complainant. The petitioner is arrested along with one another after a week and sent […]

Disputes between Landlord & Tenant Governed by Transfer of Property Act & Arbitrable

June 16, 2022 3255 Views 0 comment Print

As you are aware that Arbitration is one of the best Alternate Disputes Resolution process, which saves time, money and energy of the parties. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 no where prohibits deciding of cases through arbitration.

GST: Detention: Petitioner entitled for return of surety bond & bank guarantee furnished upon deposit of 25% of penalty

June 11, 2022 2463 Views 0 comment Print

The petitioner shall be entitled for return of the surety bond and the bank guarantee furnished. If the petitioner, upon filing the appeal with the deposit as aforesaid, files with the first respondent, the details of the appeal and the deposit made, the first respondent shall within ten [10] working days from the date of receipt of such information, return the bank guarantee/surety bond furnished.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031