This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
GST: Detention: Petitioner entitled for return of surety bond & bank guarantee furnished upon deposit of 25% of penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- New Modern Industries Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) & Anr (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
New Modern Industries Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) & Anr (Karnataka High Court)
Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka declared that if a taxable person prefers an appeal U/s. 107 of the CGST/SGST Acts against an order passed U/s. 129 of the said Acts after remitting 25 % of the penalty imposed being pre deposit such person is not required to pay penalty amount levied/to furnish bank guarantee along with a surety bond. In other words, both conditions viz furnishing bank guarantee equal to the penalty imposed (along with the surety bond) and to remit pre –deposit @ 25 % of penalt...
Author Info
