ITAT Ranchi deleted a ₹10.42 lakh addition on cash deposits during demonetization, holding they were explained from prior bank withdrawals.
In ACIT vs. Hallmark Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., the ITAT Ranchi upheld the deletion of a Rs. 6 crore income addition, ruling that the director’s statement alone, without corroborative evidence, could not be the basis for assessment.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ranchi, partially allowed the appeal of Shiv Prasad Ram a retired SAIL employee restoring his ex parte tax assessment case to the Assessing Officer for readjudication and giving him an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT Ranchi rules that an entire purchase cannot be disallowed as bogus without rejecting the books of account; only the profit element is taxable on disputed purchases.
An ITAT ruling on Aviraldhaani Foundation shows that a trust can be denied charitable registration for having a vague ‘any other activity’ clause, but natural justice must prevail.
The ITAT Ranchi directed an inquiry into cash deposits of ₹26.60 lakh, telling the Assessing Officer to verify the assessee’s claim of income from a building material business.
The ITAT Ranchi quashed a reassessment against SGS Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., ruling the approval for reopening the case was invalid due to procedural defects and a lack of conscious application of mind by the PCIT.
The ITAT Ranchi deletes a ₹1.67 crore addition to a hardware merchant’s income, ruling that cash deposits during demonetisation were explained by recorded sales.
The ITAT Ranchi quashed a Section 263 order, ruling that a tax revision cannot be based solely on an audit objection or for the re-examination of an issue already reviewed by the AO.
The ITAT Ranchi upholds an assessee’s appeal, ruling that the Assessing Officer must provide evidence to substantiate additions made solely based on ITS data.
