Tax tribunal remits Vijay Kumar Sharma assessment to CIT(A) for fresh hearing, citing non-compliance due to business hardship after demonetization.
ITAT Ranchi permits Gajanand Bhalotia to withdraw appeal as he opts for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, with an option for restoration if settlement fails.
CIT (A) was directed to reassess the long-term capital gain (LTCG) claim as it was found that new evidence submitted by assessee had not been considered during the earlier proceedings.
ITAT Ranchi remanded the matter regarding addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act back to the file of CIT(A) since paper books was not produced before AO or CIT(A).
ITAT Ranchi directed CIT(A) to reconsider the matter of disallowance due to late deposit of Employees Contribution u/s 36(1) (va) of the Income Tax Act in light of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Checkmate Services.
AO also held that despite issuing notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1), assessee did not comply with those, and AO made additions to the income found in the assessee’s account.
During the course of survey proceedings, the statement of one of the partners of the firm Mr. Zinu, was recorded, who had stated that he earns commission @ 5.5% from M/s Shapoorji Pallonji for supply of manpower.
ITAT Ranchi remands MD Yasin Construction Pvt Ltd’s appeal due to CIT(A)’s non-mentioning of reasons for dismissal, directing a de novo review.
ITAT Ranchi held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on account of non-prosecution without deciding the matter on merits is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, matter remanded back for de novo adjudication.
Ajit Kumar Khan Vs DCIT case at ITAT Ranchi clarifies that late filing fees for GST returns cannot be added summarily through intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
