Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Anand Choudhury Vs ACIT (ITAT Ranchi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Anand Choudhury Vs ACIT (ITAT Ranchi) Recorded Cash Sales Can’t Be Branded Unexplained -Demonetisation Deposits Backed by VAT Sale Assessee, proprietor of M/s Anand Hardware & Tools, filed return declaring income of ₹45.26 lakh. His case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. During assessment, AO questioned heavy cash deposits of ₹1.92 crore during the demonetisation period & made an addition of ₹1.67 crore u/s 68, treating it as unexplained cash credit, despite Assessee’s explanation that deposits arose from cash sales in October 2016 (Diwali season clearance with in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031