Smt. Priyanka Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Taking into facts and circumstances of the case it is an evident from the show cause notice u/s 274 read with section 271AAB of the Act that the Assessing Officer was not clear i.e whether it is for the clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of […]
AO has clearly conducted the enquiry and revenue did not pin point the error on the part of the assessing officer the order passed after due application of mind cannot be subjected to proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act.
ITAT held that invocation of provision of 263 to correct section under which penalty is leviable or not is beyond the power vested under section 263 of Income Tax Act,
ITAT Jaipur held that additions on account of LIC Premia treated as unexplained investment deleted as merely based on rough notings without any substantive evidence.
ITAT Jaipur held that benefit of deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act unavailable on bogus donation on adoption of unfair means.
ITAT Jaipur held that rejection of books of account on the basis of insignificant defects is unjustified as Before invoking provisions of section 145(3) AO has to bring on record material the basis on which he has arrived at the conclusion with regard to correctness/ completeness of the accounts.
ITAT Jaipur held that since the intimation under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not reflected in the online system, there cannot remain any consequent grievances on account of the said intimation.
ITAT Jaipur held that as the assessee is not driven primarily by desire or motive to earn profits but to do charity through advancement of an object of general public utility hence proviso to Sec.2(15) of the Act is therefore not applicable and accordingly assessee is entitled to benefits of section 11 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that filing of Form 67, for claiming Foreign Tax Credit, is a procedural requirement and violation of procedural norms doesn’t extinguish the substantive right of claiming the credit of Foreign Tax.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition solely on the basis of PEN drive found during the search proceedings, without checking the veracity/ reliability of the data recorded in the PEN drive, is unsustainable in law.
