Sponsored

Non-compliance inspite of repeated notices led to gross negligence hence cost of Rs. 2,000/- imposed

POONAM GANDHI 30 Mar 2023 348 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Judiciary

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ahmed Ali Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Appeal Number : ITA No. 302/JP/2022

Date of Judgement/Order : 23/02/2023

Related Assessment Year : 2010-11

Courts : All ITAT ITAT Jaipur

Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sponsored

Ahmed Ali Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

ITAT Jaipur held that non-compliance inspite of repeated notices/ summons has led to gross negligence on the part of the assessee and accordingly matter restored back and cost of Rs. 2,000/- imposed for negligent attitude during income tax proceedings.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: POONAM GANDHI

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India

Member Since: 14 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 5238

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 80DD amendment introduced vide Finance Act, 2022 cannot be given retrospective effect Appeal to High Court lies only when a substantial question of law is involved: Madhya Pradesh HC Liability determined under DTVSV Act cannot be revised by Income Tax authority: Delhi HC Interest from co-operative society and not co-operative bank is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d): ITAT Bangalore Extended period not invocable as notice didn’t alleged wilful suppression and misstatement View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Sponsored

Rotary Parking System Construction Deemed Immovable Property, ITC Ineligible: AAAR Tamil Nadu

Failure to Produce Certified Copies of Register of Members & Share Transfer Forms (MGT-1, SH-4): MCA imposes Penalty

Non-Filing of Form MGT-14 for Board Resolution Approving Accounts: MCA imposes Penalty

Delayed Filing of Form MGT-14 for Share Issue & Allotment Resolution: MCA imposes Penalty

Directorship in Over 10 public limited companies (Section 165 Violation): MCA imposes Penalty

Non-disclosure of related party transactions in Form AOC-2: MCA imposes Penalty

Delay in Filing E-Form MGT-14 for Approval of Accounts & Directors’ Report: MCA imposes Penalty

Non-Filing of E-Form CHG-4 for Satisfaction of Charge: MCA Imposes Penalty

Non-Disclosure of Loans & Director Remuneration in Related Party Transactions: MCA imposes Penalty

MCA Imposes Penalty for Missing Address & Occupation Details in PAS-3 Allottee List

Sponsored

Limitation/Compliance periods Under Income Tax Act, 1961

TDS- Section 194IA Payment on transfer of immovable property

MCA Imposes ₹28 Lakh Penalty for Inaccurate Financial Reporting by Company

SEBI clarifies on HRA issues of staff misguided by external elements

Recent GST advisories from GSTN related to Bank Details, RCM, IMS, GSTR-1

Financial Statements Signed as ‘Directors’ Instead of MD & Whole-time Director: Penalty imposed

Non-Compliance with Related Party Disclosure Standards: MCA Imposes ₹8 lakh Penalty

Gold & Silver rates as on 01.04.1981 & From 31.03.2009 to 31.03.2023

Benefit to Non-Residents under Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax Benefits to Residents & Indian Companies

View All Featured Posts

Sponsored

Rates of Depreciation as Per Income Tax Act, 1961

Rates of depreciation as per Companies Act, 2013

Due Date Compliance Calendar September 2024

Carry Forward and Set Off of Losses with FAQs

Income Tax audit under section 44AB: FAQs

Section wise Income Tax Deductions for AY 2025-26/ FY 2024-25

Clubbing of Income under Income Tax Act, 1961 with FAQs

List of Resolution Required to be Filed with ROC in Form MGT-14

Tax Deducted at Source (TDS): FAQs

Tax Benefits Available to Senior Citizens

Search Post by Date