Deduction of gratuity is available in substantive law and it cannot be disallowed merely by reference of inconsistent entries in explanation of s. 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act being a procedural provisions, it shall not take away right confirmed in s. 37 r/w s. 40A(7) and s. 36(1)(v).
ITAT Chennai held that addition of unexplained income unsustainable as source of money including identity of the creditors is duly explained by the assessee and further the amount has been transferred through proper banking channel only.
ITAT Chennai held that it is fact that under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 declarant cannot challenge sum payable before any appellate forum however once the declarant violates condition of DTVSVS Act 2020 the same can be revived by the Department.
ITAT Chennai held that TPO unreasonably rejected the CUP method consistently followed by the assessee to bench mark international transaction with its Associated Enterprise as there was no change in the facts and circumstance of the case for the impugned Assessment Year.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition merely on the basis of third-party information, without any corroborative evidence, gathered by the Investigation Wing of the Department is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Chennai held that assessment of Long Term Capital Gain entirely in the hands of assessee instead of all the co-owners of the land is unsustainable in law. LTCG should be assessed in the exact proportion to the extent the land belongs to each such co-owners.
ITAT Chennai held that expenditure of Bio-technology Research & Development cannot be disallowed simply on the allegation that expenditure was incurred before the commencement of a new line of business as such matching concept not application in the present case.
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee has claimed legal expenses and travelling & conveyance expenses before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer mainly disallowed the expenditure claimed by the assessee on the ground that the legal proceedings was undertaken in respect of the charges framed against the Directors and shareholders of […]
ITAT Chennai held that capital gain exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act includes investment in purchase or construction of one or more than one residential house
Euro Home Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) CIT(A) held that the provisions of Sec.44AD would not apply to commission income and the rental income received would be assessed under Income from House Property. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. ITAT find that commission income would not come […]
