Understand the implications of the Jayaraj Charles Vs ITO case where ITAT Chennai ruled no penalty should be imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act when a return isn’t visible on the e-filing portal.
ITAT Chennai held that disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS is justified as TDS is not deducted and assessee has failed to file any evidence that receipts have declared the amount in their return of income.
An in-depth analysis of the landmark case, K.S.M. Agencies vs ITO, assessing ITAT Chennai’s ruling on the legitimacy of digital communication channels in tax appeal processes and its implications for future assessments
ITAT Chennai in ACIT vs ETA Star Property Developers Limited case, ruled against disallowance under Section 14A in absence of earned exempt income
ITAT Chennai ruling on consequential and mandatory nature of interest under sections 234A to 234D in case of Iljin Automotive Pvt Ltd vs DCIT
ITAT Chennai in Bank of India vs ACIT case decides on applicability of TDS late fees under section 234E before June 2015,
In Deepak T. Dhanwani vs ITO, where ITAT Chennai waived penalty for delayed tax audit report due to accountant’s unavailability,
ITAT Chennai ruling in Gunaseelan Janaki Radha Vs ITO, dictating credit entries in current and savings accounts to be treated as gross receipts from business transactions, with an applicable profit rate of 8%
ITAT Chennai’s upholds entitlement of assessee to interest on tax refund under Section 244A, emphasizing principles of fairness and equity
ITAT Chennai quashed a penalty on cash payment of defaulted EMI, arguing that case presented a ‘reasonable cause’ under Section 273B.
