Orchid Foundations Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The intended purchaser i.e., M/s SVC made efforts for clearing the encroachments and incurred expenditure of Rs.811.75 Lacs which were paid through banking channels. The details of payment as well as the bank statement and acknowledgement / receipts were already furnished to Ld. AO during the course […]
Sundaram Infotech Solutions Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) We find that there is no quarrel on the proposition since the only dispute under the appeal is tax treatment under finance lease. The operating lease transactions have not been disturbed by Ld. AO and the only dispute is qua deduction of principal component under finance lease […]
ITO Vs 67th Annual Conference of CSI-2015 (ITAT Chennai) ITAT noted that the payments made by the assessee entity in accordance with bye-laws / specific purpose for which it was constituted and the AO has not disputed the nature of contribution made by assessee or the receipts transferred being directly in nexus with the income […]
Venkatesharaiyer Subramanian Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) There could be no quarrel on the fact that post-amendment to Sec. 54F, as applicable from AY 2015-16, deduction u/s 54F could not be claimed on purchase / construction of more than one residential house. However, the factual matrix would reveal that the assessee has made investment in one […]
DCIT Vs Essel Finance VKC Forex Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) assessee has advanced sum of Rs.7.5 Crores to another entity for taking a property on lease. The same has been treated by Ld. AO as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act on the ground that one of the directors of the assessee company held substantial […]
Held that reopening of assessment on the basis of the approval given in mechanical manner without application of mind is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
Held that it can be make out that the assessee has made an afterthought to file the appeal accordingly condonation of 1070 days cannot be granted on the basis of vague reasons
Held that co-operative banks are liable to deduct TDS on payment of interest on time deposits only from 01.06.2015 and not before that.
AO has made addition u/s.56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Act, towards difference between guideline value and consideration paid for purchase of property as unexplained investment.
Held that addition, only on the basis of information received from investigation wing ignoring all the evidences filed by the assessee, is unsustainable in law
