PCIT was of the view that the difference of Rs.25 lakhs in view of the guideline value fixed by Stamp Valuation Authority at Rs.3.50 crores is to be accepted and added to the return of income of the assessee. We are of the view that this is highly debatable issue and even the tolerance limit of 10% is to be considered or not is again a debate.
SC has held that the assessee is entitled to claim mutuality in respect of entrance fee collected from these non-voting right members.
A. Nagarajan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Upon careful consideration of factual matrix, it emerges that the assessee’s land has been acquired by NHAI for which the assessee has been compensated at certain rates. On one of the parcels of land, a farm house is situated for which separate compensation has been paid. The primary argument […]
Held that repair expenditure of propaganda van, a gifted vehicle, was alleged to be met by the donor. The onus was on assessee to negate the allegation of revenue. However, no such onus was discharged. Disallowance of expenditure justified.
Natarajan Purushothaman Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) During appellate proceedings, the assessee submitted that he used to bring cash during visits to India and it was customary to provide some cash to the parents during such visit. The Ld. CIT(A), inter-alia, observed that the deposits of Rs.3.45 Lacs was stated to funded out of earlier withdrawals […]
Ahmed World Travels Tours & Cargo Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) As regards cash payments made for hotel expenses, although, the Assessing Officer stated that the assessee has incurred expenses in cash, but it was the argument of the assessee that it has purchased foreign currency (Saudi Riyal) to be given to its […]
Daeseung Autoparts India Pvt.Ltd Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) We have gone through reasons given by the Assessing Officer to reject additional depreciation on capitalization of forex loss in light of provisions of section 32(1)(iia) of the Act, and we ourselves do not subscribe to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee […]
ACIT Vs Dharmapuri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) The material facts are that during assessment proceedings, the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) was examined by Ld. AO. As per the statutory provisions, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction for an amount not exceeding 7.5% of total income and an amount not […]
Tangar Exports LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The Assessing Officer has made adjustment of total income computed in the intimation received u/s.143(1) of the Act, towards deduction claimed u/s.80JJAA of the Act, in respect of employment of new employees on the ground that the assessee has not satisfied conditions prescribed therein, including filing of audit […]
Dhanalakshmi Mills Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Admittedly, the Assessing Officer has caused necessary inquiries with regard to computation of long term capital gain derived transfer of property and has computed capital gain by taking into account cost of acquisition claimed by the assessee without disturbing consideration received from transfer of property, even though, there […]
