ITAT Hyderabad held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on the ground of non-deposition of self-assessment tax by the assessee needs re-verification since assessee incurred losses and therefore has a reason for not depositing the self-assessment tax. Hence, matter remanded.
ITAT Hyderabad directed to exclude companies having turnover of more than or less than 10 times of the turnover of the assessee from the list of comparable. Accordingly, matter remanded back to the file of AO/ TPO.
The assessment was completed by Ld. AO u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 determining total income at Rs.2,78,46,98,694/-. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed by the appellant.
ITAT Hyderabad held that as per the provisions of section 115VG of the Income Tax Act, once the assessee opts for the Tonnage Tax Scheme, the assessee cannot take the shield of taking the deduction of any other expenditure.
ITAT Hyderabad held that weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act in respect of clinical trials expenses incurred outside approved R&D facilities is allowable post approval by prescribed authority.
Explore the ITAT Hyderabad’s decision on interest as an international transaction in Clinasia Labs Pvt Ltd vs ITO case. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
ITAT Hyderabad remands Jonna Iron Mart Vs ACIT case regarding Section 41(1) addition due to lack of discussion on Sundry Creditors difference by Income Tax Authorities.
Maddikunta Sanjeeva Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad): Analysis of ITAT’s decision to delete additions made by AO due to incomplete notice under section 148.
In the case of Sangam Wires Vs ITO, ITAT Hyderabad directed AO to restrict addition of Rs. 16.8 crores as bogus purchases, focusing on the profit embedded amount. Get insights here.
ITAT Hyderabad rules Section 115BBDA of the Income Tax Act does not apply to domestic companies, deleting the addition made by the Income Tax Officer.
