M/s. Mili Enterprise Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) High Court issued notices to the Government observing that the department should at least provide the reason for blocking the input tax credit and it should be specified in a notice under rule 86(A). FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT Heard learned Advocate […]
Roshani Sana Jaiswal Vs Commissioner of Central Taxes (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court which ruled that personal bank accounts of promoters cannot be attached under CGST 1. The respondent, before triggering the provisions of Section 83 of the Act, had to satisfy itself that there was a ‘pending’ proceeding under the provisions of Section […]
Suprimkumar Jitendrabhai Patel Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties through video conferencing. 2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with File No. CCST/STO/ENF/FSU9/SUPRIM PATEL/202021/B.1 registered with the Office of Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat […]
Sanjay Prahladbhai Patel Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) It is submitted that the applicant is arrested in connection with the alleged demand by the GST authorities without determining the extent liability of the said alleged demand. It is submitted that the arrest of the applicant in the alleged offence is effected only on […]
Gujarat High Court relegates GST appeal to statutory authority. Petitioner challenged summary order lacking detailed consideration. Alternative remedy suggested.
Karma Buildcon Through Chetan Rameshbhai Jogi Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) For Builders, Real Estate developers, Para 2 Notification No.11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 provides for deduction of 33% from the value of supply as deemed value of land. In some of the cases due to this artificial deduction of value of […]
Bhavesh Kiritbhai Kalani Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. There are no proceedings against the present petitioner under Sections 62, 63, 64, 67, 73 and 74 of the Act. 2. There is no reason therefore, to invoke section 83 against the writ applicant and proceedings. 3. Since the proceedings are initiated by the […]
State was not expected to provide all essential infrastructure, medication and treatment facilities at once, but if the people were taken into confidence with regard to the efforts being made by the State to take care of the people suffering from the pandemic, the people at large would definitely cooperate and appreciate the efforts being made by the State.
SUO MOTU Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1 The Division Bench presided by the Chief Justice on 06.04.2021 had a dialogue with the Senior most State Law Officers, learned Advocate General and the learned Government Pleader expressing concern regarding the upsurge of COVID-19 cases in the State and requesting the State to take […]
Gujarat High Court directs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council to determine if it can act as an Arbitrator after serving as a Conciliator.
