Service Providers in Telecom Sector” meant and included only the Telecom Service Providers of services mentioned therein. The ambit and scope of such exclusion was not of Service Providers who render services to such Telecom Service Providers. Though, a similar list was not appended to FTP or HBPv1, there was no reason for a different interpretation to be placed to FTP 2015-20. Clearly, what was made ineligible for availing benefit of SEIS in terms of paragraph 3.09(2)(i) were the Telecom Service Providers and not the Service Providers who provide services to such Telecom Sector.
Dar Housing Limited Vs National E-Assessment Centre Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court admitted and granted stay against assessment order passed passed by National e-assessment centre by not considering the submissions of the assessee and not providing the opportunity of hearing to the assessee. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER of DELHI HIGH COURT 1. […]
Axis Ispat Private Limited Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) A perusal of some of the show cause notices (SCNs) which have been issued shows that, there is a doubt as to whether the reply submitted by the Petitioner in June, 2020 has been considered by the ROC while issuing the show cause notices […]
Rakesh Malhotra Vs Government of National Capital Territory of India and Ors (Delhi High Court) 1. Last night, we had passed the order in W.P .(C) No. 4970/2021 on the assurance given by the learned Solicitor General, that Delhi would be provided with Medical Oxygen as per its allocation made on 21.04.2021 —with effect from […]
Withholding tax rate of 5% is to be applied while making payment of dividend by Indian entity to its shareholder in Netherlands after applying the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause in the Tax Treaty between India and Netherlands.
Court On Its Own Motion Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (Delhi High Court) Taking suo moto cognizance of the alarming resurgence of Covid-19, under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, it is hereby ordered that in all matters pending before this court and courts subordinate to this court, wherein such […]
In continuation of this Court’s Office Order No.223/RG/DHC/2021 dated 8.4.2021, keeping in view the alarming rise in the Covid-19 cases in the NCT of Delhi, it has been ordered that all the Hon’ble Benches of this Court shall, with effect from 19.04.2021, take up extremely urgent matters filed in the year 2021 only.
Back Office It Solutions Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi high Court) We are of the view that the contesting respondents were mandatorily required to have a pre-show cause notice consultation with the petitioner-company and that having not being done in the instant matter, the proceedings initiated by the contesting respondents via […]
Since there was a variation made to the declared income of the petitioner qua the assessment year 2018-2019, a show-cause notice should have been issued, before finalizing the variation.
Maruti Insurance Broking Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) As noticed above, the assessee did all that, which was necessary, to set up the insurance broking business. Only to recapitulate, the assessee, after its incorporation opened a bank account, entered into an agreement for deputing employees (who were to further its insurance business), gave […]
