Read the full text of the Competition Commission of India’s decision to dismiss Anti-Profiteering proceedings against L&T Parel Project LLP.
Explore the Competition Commission of India’s judgment on Jitendra Bathla’s allegations against DLF Gayatri Developers. Analysis of Section 4 violation in Club Agreement and market assessment.
Detailed breakdown and analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s ruling on consumer fraud and counterfeit products in the Sanjay Kumar Vs Karagiri Studio case.
Read the full order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) where Anti-Profiteering proceedings against New World Realty LLP are dropped. Understand the details and conclusions of the case.
Issue No. 1 addressed whether Anti-Profiteering proceedings initiated against Puma Realtors under Section 171 of the CGST Act should continue post the NCLT order dated 01.06.2021. The commission considered the NCLT’s order, which extinguished all liabilities, including passing on the benefit of ITC. Consequently, the proceedings were discontinued.
Read the analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s decision in the N. Rajesh Kumar vs Shubham Consumer Durables Pvt. Ltd. case. The Commission concludes that no violation of the Competition Act is established, dismissing allegations of cheating, misappropriation, and fraud.
Fast Track Call Cab Pvt. Ltd. Vs ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Competition Commission of India) Brief Background of the Case The present case is a dispute between Ola (ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.), an app-based taxi aggregator, and two radio taxi service providers (Fast Track Call Cab Pvt. Ltd.). The informants essentially accused the company of abusing […]
XYZ (Confidential) Vs Alphabet Inc. (Competition Commission of India) CCI imposes monetary penalty of Rs. 936.44 crore on Google for anti-competitive practices in relation to its Play Store policies The Competition Commission of India (CCI) today imposed a penalty of Rs. 936.44 crore on Google for abusing its dominant position with respect to its Play Store […]
CCI held that all price differentiations may not be discriminatory, more so when same is based on reasonable classification of consumers to which they are offered.
CCI imposed monetary as well as behavioral sanctions on MMT-Go for abusing its dominant position and also for having anti-competitive arrangement with OYO. Monetary penalty is also imposed on OYO for its anti-competitive arrangement with MMT-Go vide which MMT-Go delisted the competitors of OYO from its online portals in 2018.
