Read detailed analysis of CCI order directing further investigation into 8 projects by Lucknow Development Authority for potential profiteering issues.
Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (Competition Commission of India) Introduction: The recent order issued by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in the case of Sumit Mansingka vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd highlights the Commission’s proactive approach towards ensuring compliance and fair practices in the construction and real estate sector. The CCI has […]
The Commission observed that in addition to NBFCs, various financial institutions, including public sector banks and private sector banks, compete to provide loans against property. Given this competition, and the lack of evidence showing Hero FinCorp’s dominance, the Commission concluded that Hero FinCorp was not dominant in the relevant market. As a result, the Commission found no grounds to examine allegations of abusive conduct.
Analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s order on the Creed Gym vs Curefit case involving alleged breach of collaboration agreement and competition concerns.
Kanwaljeet Kaur Soni Vs Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Inc. (Competition Commission of India) The CCI case (No. 05/2023) revolves around allegations filed by Mrs. Kanwaljeet Kaur Soni, the Informant, against Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Inc. (ACFE/OP-1), Netrika Consulting India Private Limited (NCIPL/OP-2), and The Open Thinking Academy (OTA/OP-3). The Informant alleges contravention of […]
Analysis of Competition Commission of India’s examination of alleged contraventions involving government entities in procurement of laboratory services.
CCI discontinues Anti-Profiteering proceedings against Bhagwati Infra after DGAP investigation. No evidence of further profiteering was found.
Full report on Competition Commission of India’s order against Panchshil Infrastructure for anti-profiteering under CGST Act, 2017. Read details here.
CCI discontinues anti-profiteering proceedings against Prasu Infrabuild. The firm had no other projects, negating possible profiteering violations.
Explore the analysis of the case between DGAP and Vishwanath Builders on application of anti-profiteering provisions under CGST Act, 2017.
