Follow Us:

CESTAT Ahmedabad

When sale is on FOR basis, place of removal will be buyer’s place

May 7, 2022 9429 Views 0 comment Print

Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) There is no dispute in the fact that the sale of goods is on FOR basis, freight and transit insurance is included in the price of the goods and the same was not collected from the buyer of the goods. In this background, the place […]

CENVAT Credit cannot be denied on removal of goods from the place of removal up to customers place

May 6, 2022 651 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT set aside the order denying the CENVAT Credit to the assessee in respect of outward Goods Transport Agent supply for period prior to April 01, 2008. Held that, the CBIC has prescribed certain conditions for allowing credit which need to be satisfied and remanded back the matter for passing a fresh order after verifying the documents to ascertain that whether the assessee has fulfilled such conditions.

Cenvat credit admissible on ECIS services for modernization & renovation of existing factory

May 3, 2022 1152 Views 0 comment Print

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case the appellant’s cenvat credit was denied in respect of input services viz. ECIS. The credit on ECIS was denied on the ground that this service is falling under the exclusion clause in the definition of input service under Rule 2 (l) of […]

Refund amount credited to Consumer Welfare Fund, on failure to discharge burden of unjust enrichment

April 25, 2022 3180 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant has paid a certain amount of customs duty. Thereafter, the appellant has sought to create an asset in the shape of ‘receivables’ so as to not pass the effect of payment of duty to the profit and loss account. To nullify the effect of the entry ‘receivables’, it has created a parallel entry exactly opposite to the receivables in its ledger as ‘provisions’.

CA Certificate of Stock valuation cannot be ignored without any reliable contra evidence

April 24, 2022 4371 Views 0 comment Print

Kumaka Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that there is no dispute on the facts that entire stock of product “Ethyl Alcohol” manufactured in one unit was transferred to its sister unit under Invoices on payment of excise duty. The sister unit had taken credit of duty paid and Captively used the said […]

CENVAT Credit eligible on ECIS for Modernization/Renovation/Repair of Existing Factory

April 18, 2022 3228 Views 0 comment Print

Reliance Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Appellant’s factory is admittedly huge existing petroleum industry and working for decades. The ECIS service was used for expansion, renovation and modernization of overall existing petroleum plant. As per inclusion clause of the definition the services relating to modernization, renovation is an admissible input service. In […]

Section 11B of Central Excise Act not governs the grant of refund claims on account of finalization of provisional assessment

April 18, 2022 3960 Views 0 comment Print

India Gelatine & Chemicals Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the instant case there is no finalization of Provisional assessment and there is no challenge to any such assessment, in these circumstances the refund would not be governed by provisions of Rule 9 B. The appellant has claimed that the lower authorities have […]

Service Tax not payable on Notional Interest on Refundable Security Deposit

April 18, 2022 1362 Views 0 comment Print

Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The dispute in the present appeals relates to service tax on interest free deposit amount collected by the Appellant from the demat account holders under the Scheme and in lieu of the same Appellant has not collected AMC charges. However, we find that the […]

No Service Tax on Construction Services prior to 1st July 2010

April 18, 2022 3609 Views 1 comment Print

Jagdish Pala Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the Appellant are engaged in the construction of Residential and Commercial Complexes and received the booking amount as well as instilment amount from his buyers. Revenue proceeded against them on the ground that they have evaded payment of Service Tax on […]

Substantial evidence needed to prove allegation of non-re-warehousing of goods

April 17, 2022 792 Views 0 comment Print

Faizan Texturising Vs C.C.E. Bharuch (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Facts-The appellant is a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture of Polyester Texturised Yarn and Polyester Twisted Yarn. Their factory was visited by the officers on 21.04.2003, who conducted various checks and verifications. As a result, shortage of 7618 kg. imported raw material viz. “Bright Polyester Spin Draw […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031