Follow Us:

CESTAT Ahmedabad

Service tax under RCM payable on Fee paid to stock exchange- Singapore

March 15, 2022 855 Views 0 comment Print

Dishman Pharmaceutical & Chemicals Ltd. Vs C.S.T.-Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad) As regard the service tax demand on stock exchange fees, we find that no documentary evidence was produced to show that this is a statutory levy and the appellant have paid as reimbursement. It appears that the Stock Exchange has charged fees to the appellant […]

Price of contemporeous goods cannot be applied invariably in each & every case

March 15, 2022 1224 Views 0 comment Print

Chakra Special Trading Co. Pvt Ltd Vs C.C. Kandla (CESTAT Ahmedabad) It is settled law that the price of contemporeous goods cannot be applied invariably in each and every case. Before applying the enhanced comparable price varies circumtances need to be verified such as the quality of goods, quantity of goods, country of origin etc. […]

Excavation & removal of over burden & mining of ore falls under Mining Services

March 12, 2022 3480 Views 0 comment Print

Associated Soap Stone Distributing Company Pvt Ltd Vs C.S.T. Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case, the issue to be decided is that the service in question is classifiable under the category of Site Formation and clearance, Excavation and Earth Moving and Demolition service as contended by the revenue or under the category of […]

Service tax not payable on packed food sold as take away & not served in restaurant

March 9, 2022 3753 Views 0 comment Print

Hotel UTSAV Vs C.C.E. & S.T. SURAT-I  (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the appellant have been discharging the service tax in respect of food served in the restaurant to their customers. However, they are not paying service tax in respect of packed food which is sold as take away either on the counter of the […]

New condition imposed on import not applies to import already originated from the port of shipping

March 6, 2022 1950 Views 0 comment Print

Rasrasna Foods Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad) ThThe brief facts of the case are that the appellant had imported a consignment of Sajji Khar at Mundra Port under warehousing Bill of entry No.6272028 dated 28.12.2019. On 16.01.2020. The FSSAI authority certified that the appellant holds FSSAI license and the sample conforms to the standards […]

Cenvat Credit on repair & maintenance of windmill located outside factory premises allowable

March 6, 2022 5181 Views 0 comment Print

Swiss Glascoate Equipments Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue involved is whether the appellant is entitled for Cenvat Credit in respect of repair and maintenance of wind mill which is located outside the factory premises. Both the lower authorities have denied the Cenvat Credit on the ground that the wind mill is located […]

Date of Cancellation of sale of flat is relevant date for computing limitation under Section 11B

March 5, 2022 1854 Views 0 comment Print

Pramukh Realty Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The brief facts of the case are that the appellant have pad service tax on Construction of residential Complex for which they have entered into the agreement for sale of flats, accordingly they have paid service tax on sale of flats. Subsequently the sale of flats has […]

Refund claim filing date should be reckoned from the date of first filing of refund claim

March 4, 2022 1740 Views 0 comment Print

Voxco Pigments And Chemicals Pvt Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT AHMEDABAD) There is no dispute that the appellant had filed the refund claim on 01/06/2017 for an amount of Rs. 12,25,023/-. Thereafter, on the audit query, the appellant had decided to reduce the refund claim and, therefore, withdrew the earlier claimed and thereafter claim […]

No interest to be levied by Commissioner on assessee-company under CENVAT Credit Rules

February 5, 2022 996 Views 0 comment Print

Interest was not leviable by Commissioner under Cenvat Credit rules as Commissioner, on his own, examined as to whether assessee was eligible to avail and utilize CENVAT credit under rule 11 or rule 3(2) of the 2004 Credit Rules however, assessee had not made any such claim for availing the credit. It was, therefore, not possible to uphold the order passed by Commissioner.

Cenvat credit cannot be denied on credit attributed to wastage arising during the course of manufacture

January 30, 2022 1707 Views 0 comment Print

Lanxess India Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Admittedly the appellant has sent the inputs chemicals for job work in the water base. The entire processed goods have been returned within 180 days. The remaining quantity was subsequently returned back though after 180 days but the same was in the form of wastage. […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031