CESTAT Ahmedabad rules non-technical persons cannot decide the classification of complex drug products. Key case: VVF India Ltd vs. Commissioner of C.E. & S.T.
Read the detailed analysis of Gulmohar Park Mall Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad) where CESTAT upheld the adjustment of excess service tax towards subsequent liabilities.
Read the detailed analysis of Sai Consulting Engineers Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad) where CESTAT rules on procedural lapses affecting Cenvat credit.
Learn about P I Industries Ltd’s appeal against customs duty demand for goods lost in a fire at their SEZ unit. Detailed analysis of SEZ Rules and Customs Act provisions.
Detailed analysis of Rajat International’s appeal against Customs duty, interest, and penalty for importing plastic broomsticks. Learn about the classification dispute and legal arguments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that waste and scrap, even if exceeding SION norms, are exempt from customs duty provided they are cleared with proper permissions and duty payments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Jewel Utensils Industries, confirming compliance with export obligations under the Advance Authorization Scheme, exempting all duties.
Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling: No service tax on freight margin recovered from customers in outbound shipment cases. Analysis & implications discussed.
Understand CESTAT’s decision on inclusion of separately shown freight and insurance charges in excisable goods’ assessable value.
In Roop Telesonic Ultrasonix Limited vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad), SEZ service tax refund upheld despite procedural lapse.
